Bluffs Advocate


The Great School Rip-Off

Selling school property to augment funding is short-sighted and futile

By Janet Bojti, Toronto grandparent

Liz Sandals            Ontario has stepped up the pressure on the Toronto District School Board to close and sell more schools. In the ninth of thirteen directives handed down by the Ministry on January 15, 2015, the province flexed its majority muscle, ordering the TDSB to submit a 3-year capital plan, prepare a list of schools for the chop, and get on with it. Furthermore, the province will likely release new guidelines for accommodation reviews this spring. It euphemistically hints at an accelerated process, which probably means fewer public meetings and reduced parent and community participation on accommodation review committees. The TDSB trustees obediently passed a motion on February 10 to prepare the way for 10 accommodation reviews which will likely get underway in the fall of 2015. Just reading the names of the schools on the list, it's easy to see that once again, most of the communities targeted for losing their neighbourhood schools will be low-income areas.

The Fire Sale Thus Far

"Since amalgamation, the TDSB has disposed of 82 properties. Of these, 16 properties were disposed of by the TDSB before the formation of the Toronto Lands Corporation. The Toronto Lands Corporation has disposed of 66 properties…Approximately $470 million has been generated in revenue," says a document issued by the TDSB for trustee reference on January 27, 2015. It puts the selling price for a publicly owned, fully serviced school property at just under $6 million. This revenue is supposed to form the core of the Board's capital budget. But even if the province were to match the sum dollar for dollar, it wouldn't begin to address the Board's $3.5 billion maintenance deficit. To do that, they'd have to sell nearly all the schools in the system.

A total of 647.74 acres of school property has been sold to date. That puts the dollar value of school property at just below $720,000.00 per acre—the price of a three-bedroom detached house in North York. How many townhouses or large condo units can be squeezed onto an acre of land? How many will fit on the 5.8-acre site that used to be Brooks Rd. Public School in Scarborough, or the 5-acre site that was once Heron Park Jr. P.S.? Both of these Scarborough elementary schools were sold to private sector purchasers. Where will the new homeowners send their kids to school?

Why the low price? Because according to the TDSB's Jan 27 document, "approximately 60 per cent have been purchased by public sector organizations." If the purchaser was another school board, the buyer got a 40 per cent discount on the fair market value of the property. The French school boards bought 13 of the 82 properties. Twelve went to the Toronto Catholic District School Board. These twenty-five sales conveniently redistribute school properties among the province's own jurisdictions. Win-Wynne.

When a public school board wants to sell land, according to provincial regulation 4498, a rigid hierarchy of preferred buyers gets the first chance to buy it. First in line are the Catholic or French-language school boards and they get it at a discount. If the school boards don't bite, then the municipality gets a chance. The municipality gets to pay fair market value—no discount—which is still very low. Next in line come the broader public services (universities, colleges, and hospitals), and then the non-profit sector. They too pay fair market value. Finally, if no school board, municipality, public sector institution, or non-profit agency wants to buy the land, it goes on the open market. Then the price goes up, the bidding begins, and the land goes to the buyer with the best offer. According to the Jan 27 document, 50 per cent of the 82 properties went to the public sector, 43 per cent went to private owners who the TDSB does not identify and 7 per cent went to non-profit and charitable organizations. These properties are now gone forever, yet the Board didn't really capitalize much on this liquidation of public assets.

Leasing is a Money Generator

The TDSB owns thirty-three properties that it leases to private schools, non-profit organizations, child care centres, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, and the City of Toronto, according to a TDSB printout dated Jan. 27, 2015. It shows the total net rental income from these properties is over $5 million per year. The tenants pay operating costs including utilities, heat, cleaning, and maintenance. The long-term gain from this net rental income plus operating costs for these properties compares favourably to any one-time sale. Leasing is the better public option for the school system, as it produces income and the sites remain in the school board's hands, ready to be reopened as operating schools or community hubs as the city's needs change.

Get Ready for More School Closures

"Thirty buildings were closed as operating schools between 1998 and 2013. Currently, nineteen of these buildings have been sold, eight are being leased out by the Toronto Lands Corporation, and three are being used for TDSB purposes," says the Jan 27, 2015 document. Operating schools are the ones full of kids. According to provincial regulations in the past, if a school board chooses to close an operating school, it must conduct a pupil accommodation review. Unless TDSB trustees find their backbones soon, more communities will lose their neighbourhood schools and with them, their community hubs.

In compliance with the province's orders, the TDSB published a list of 133 schools it deemed to be below a 65 per cent utilization rate. This is where the illusion of half-empty schools comes in. Only the elementary or secondary students counted as users of the school space. Not counted were child care centres, nor the Section 23 programs operated by treatment centres such as Holland Bloorview or Muki Baum. Not counted were the TDSB's own special education Caring and Safe Schools for children and youth with disabilities and mental or behavioral disorders. Not counted were the 20,000 adult day school ESL students. Not counted were 78 parenting centres serving 14,000 preschool children and their parents and caregivers. Not counted were 2,600 adult daytime literacy students. Not counted were general interest and daytime seniors' programmes serving 30,000 more adults. Had they been included in the utilization rate calculation, many of the half-empty schools would have been shown to be operating at much closer to full building capacity.

The province demanded a three-year plan so the Board delivered a list of 60 schools that could be closed. Most are located in the poorer communities in York, Rexdale, and Scarborough. On that list there are schools which house child care centres, treatment centre programs, special education for disabled students, and adult education classes. The province seems bent on destroying the very community hubs it claims to value. Even the mayor was alarmed.

Board Budget Blues

All school boards have two separate budgets: the operating budget and the capital budget. The operating budget keeps the system going. The $3.1 billion operating budget covers salaries, utilities, administration, transportation—all costs related to student learning and school board operations. The $135 million capital budget pays for building new schools and for retrofitting and reconstructing existing school building facilities.

Since amalgamation in 1998, the operating budget has had annual shortfalls. At that time, school boards lost their power to raise their own revenue from local taxes. Their income now stems directly from the province, and it's never been enough. Year after year, the Board has pillaged one budget line to support another. It has made massive cuts to staff and programs. It has deferred maintenance. Huge gaps exist between provincial grants and the actual costs for just about everything: staffing allowances, salaries, libraries, guidance, ESL, special education, transportation, and school offices. This leaves the TDSB to fill the funding gaps. To compound the problem, the province rolled out expensive initiatives like all-day kindergarten and a cap on class size, but then didn't provide adequate funding for them.

Meanwhile the school buildings have begun to crumble. Maintenance has suffered as the board has struggled with its operating costs and there is now a $3.5 million maintenance deficit. Of the TDSB's 588 operating schools, 226 are in critical condition and 55 schools are really dire and require extensive renovation. A new school costs over $25 million.

The province told school boards not to expect any increases in funding. School boards must balance their budgets and by law cannot run deficits. When school boards across the province complained bitterly about the funding formula, the province said if they couldn't manage on the money they received, they'd have to sell some of their real estate. The proceeds from real estate sales, the province ruled, had to support their capital budgets. To sweeten the deal, the province offered matching funds for every school sold. Under tight provincial supervision, school boards could then proceed to refurbish their school buildings. But the money didn't go very far. The sale from a $6 million dollar school plus a matching $6 million dollar grant was not sufficient to cover the massive retrofitting required. When construction costs at Nelson Mandela Park ran beyond their original estimates, the province stopped its capital grants for two years. School construction ground to a halt but property sales continued apace. The $470 million generated by TDSB property sales to date has almost dried up.

The Squeeze Is Back On

Seventeen years ago, Mike Harris said he would close over 100 schools in Toronto. Today it's Kathleen Wynne. The province holds all the cards. The Toronto District School Board was set up to fail from the start. The province has the board cornered; it has controlled public education funding for a decade and a half and has starved it.

The province's other moves have been to undercut the political strength of elected school trustees. (It is important to recall that the former school boards in Toronto, York, East York, Etobicoke, North York, and Scarborough had all managed their budgets, maintained their school buildings well, and created some award-winning program initiatives in response to local needs before amalgamation.) The first provincial cut in 1998 was to slice trustee incomes in half. With current salaries of $27,000 a year, only the retired or independently wealthy can devote the time necessary to do the job. Last week, in compliance with ministry directives, Toronto trustees voted themselves a further pay cut, down to $11,000 per annum. Recently, the province removed part-time constituency assistants and office space given to TDSB trustees. Both moves will ensure that the job will be done so badly, the public will not protest when the province finds an excuse to take complete control of the TDSB, which, judging from the minister's recent remarks, may happen any day. The implications for democracy in the school system are stark.

The Toronto District School Board educates fully 12 per cent of Ontario's children, but receives only five per cent of the funding available for public education in Toronto. Selling school property to augment funding is not only short-sighted, it's futile. The province must overhaul the funding formula now or restore the power of taxation to local school trustees.